Engineering

AI-Native Laravel Engineering

Enterprise platforms built on Laravel, with AI designed in from the start rather than added later.

Most teams do not need another CRUD app. They need a system that holds their domain logic, survives an audit, scales past the pilot, and has intelligence built into it rather than bolted on afterwards. Laravel is the fastest credible route to that system, and it is also the best-equipped PHP framework for running AI in production. We have built on it for over a decade, including a HIPAA-compliant multi-tenant platform carrying real patient data, and we run our own AI pipelines on it every day.

Who this is for

Built for teams whose systems have outgrown them

CTOs and VPs of Engineering

You own a roadmap that has outgrown the team that started it, and you need senior people who can ship without a six-month ramp-up.

Teams carrying legacy PHP

A business-critical system on legacy PHP, CodeIgniter, or an old Laravel version. You need it modernised without stopping delivery for a year.

Product teams with a stalled rewrite

The Java or .NET replatform is eighteen months in and still not live. Laravel will get you to a shipped system considerably faster.

Enterprises past the AI pilot

The proof of concept worked. Now it has to run reliably, handle real volume, respect permissions and pass a security review.

Beyond CRUD

What we actually build with Laravel

Laravel has a reputation for simple web apps. These are the systems we ship with it, the kind most people assume need a heavier stack.

Multi-tenant SaaS platforms

Per-tenant data isolation, custom domains, plan-based feature gating, usage metering and billing. Built so your first tenant and your ten thousandth run on the same codebase.

Tenant isolation Usage metering Feature flags Subscription billing Custom domains

Regulated and audit-heavy systems

Builds where encryption, access scoping and a complete audit trail are requirements rather than nice to have. We have delivered a HIPAA-compliant multi-tenant platform carrying real patient data, with every technical safeguard evidenced rather than asserted.

HIPAA compliance Immutable audit logs Encryption at rest Role-based access Data retention policies

Real-time systems

Live operational dashboards, collaborative editing, presence, and LLM responses streamed token by token. All over WebSockets on Laravel Reverb, with no separate Node service to run.

Laravel Reverb WebSockets Live dashboards Token streaming Presence

High-throughput processing

Queue architectures on Horizon that handle millions of jobs with retries, backoff, rate limiting and proper visibility. Laravel Octane where sustained low latency matters.

Horizon Octane Batch processing Rate limiting Job orchestration

Internal operations platforms

Filament-based admin systems that replace a pile of spreadsheets and five SaaS subscriptions with one tool your team owns. Usually built in weeks rather than quarters.

Filament Role-based access Custom workflows Reporting Bulk operations

Legacy modernisation

Strangler-fig migrations that move a legacy system to Laravel route by route while it stays in production. No feature freeze, no big-bang cutover, no long gap in delivery.

Strangler-fig migration Zero-downtime cutover Data migration Version upgrades Test harness

API platforms and integration hubs

Versioned APIs and the connective tissue between systems that were never designed to talk to each other. ERP, Salesforce, payment rails, logistics providers, internal services.

Versioned REST APIs Webhooks ERP and CRM integration Payment rails Sanctum and OAuth

Production AI pipelines

Long-running, retryable, cost-aware AI work such as transcription, extraction, classification, scoring and summarisation, chained as jobs with human review built into the loop.

Job chains RAG Vector search Human in the loop Cost controls
Laravel and AI

Why Laravel is a good place to run AI

AI workloads are slow, expensive, failure-prone and permission-sensitive. Laravel has had solid answers to all four for years. They were just built for other reasons first.

Queues were built for this

LLM calls are slow, rate-limited and fail intermittently. Horizon gives you retries, exponential backoff, rate limiting, batching and dead-letter handling without writing any of it. Most stacks add this later.

Your data is already modelled

Retrieval is only hard when your data lives somewhere else. With Eloquent, the context a model needs is usually a relationship away, so there is no ETL project and no second source of truth.

Authorisation is already there

An AI feature that answers questions it should not is a data breach. Policies and Gates already encode who can see what, so retrieval and agent tools inherit your permission model instead of reinventing it.

Streaming without a second stack

Reverb streams tokens to the browser over WebSockets. No separate Node service, no extra deployment target, no duplicate auth layer to keep in sync.

A control panel for non-engineers

Filament gives your ops and domain people a real interface to review AI output, correct it and approve it. Human review stops being a slide and becomes a screen someone uses.

Cost and monitoring built in

Token spend, latency and failure rates become metrics on jobs you already monitor. You find out about a runaway prompt from a dashboard rather than from an invoice.

The ecosystem

The Laravel AI stack we use

The Laravel AI ecosystem has grown quickly over the last two years. These are the packages we run in production, so you do not have to spend a quarter working out which ones hold up.

Prism

Provider-agnostic LLM layer

One API across OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, Ollama and others, with structured output and tool calling. Change provider on price or latency without rewriting your application. We use it in production today.

Laravel MCP

Expose your app to AI agents

Laravel's official Model Context Protocol package. Turn your application's capabilities into tools that Claude and other agents can call directly, governed by the authorisation rules you already have.

Scout and vector search

Retrieval and RAG

Semantic search across your own data using pgvector or a managed vector store, driven from the Eloquent models you already have. This is the foundation for grounded answers with citations.

Agent frameworks

Multi-step orchestration

Neuron AI and LarAgent for agents that plan, call tools and loop, with memory and guardrails. Your team stays in PHP instead of running a parallel Python service alongside the main app.

Pennant

Safe rollout

Feature flags so AI features go to a pilot group first, get measured, and can be switched off immediately if quality or cost moves the wrong way.

Laravel Boost

AI-assisted development

Gives coding agents accurate, version-specific context about your actual application, so AI-assisted development produces code that matches your conventions rather than plausible guesses.

Case study

A HIPAA-compliant platform carrying real patient data

We spent about three months building a multi-tenant dental referral platform on Laravel. Referrals move between two independent practices carrying names, dates of birth, insurance IDs, medical alerts, clinical notes and imaging, so protected health information is the domain model rather than a layer on top of it.

12 of 12

Technical safeguards satisfied, each one evidenced rather than asserted

60

Distinct audited actions in an append-only log

6 years

Immutable log retention under object lock

15 min

Idle session lifetime, with two documented restore drills

Tenancy is a schema decision

The usual multi-tenant design keeps a current practice on the session and scopes queries to it. That breaks the moment a user belongs to two practices or a record legitimately belongs to both. We removed the idea of a current practice entirely and resolve access per record, per office, from the caller's own memberships. A missing scope then shows up as a visible bug in review rather than an invisible one in production.

Audit the reads, not just the writes

A breach investigation asks who saw this patient, and a write log cannot answer that. Opening a referral thread is an access event, and so is generating a signed URL for an X-ray. We log which fields changed rather than the values, so the audit table does not become a second, less protected copy of the data.

Minimum necessary shapes your identifiers

Referral codes embedded the patient surname so staff could read them out over the phone. That made the code itself protected health information, so it could not appear in any outbound email. Minimum necessary is not a policy you write at the end. It constrains identifier design before the first migration.

Order security gates by what they do

Three login checks ran before the two-factor hand-off because they read like one ordered set. Two of them refuse a session, but the unverified-email branch grants one and redirects, which meant a password alone could reach a live session and the 2FA re-enrolment endpoint. Checks that refuse a session can run before a step-up. Anything that grants one has to run after.

Data leaves through the side doors

Encryption in transit and at rest is the straightforward part. The real work was closing the quiet leaks: a storage key ending in a filename the uploader chose, a retrying job logging a raw exception with a signed URL in it, a search index holding plaintext clinical notes by design. None of these appear on a compliance checklist.

You are only as compliant as your least-compliant vendor

Every service that can see patient data needs a Business Associate Agreement, and the chain has to be complete. The gap is rarely the obvious vendor. It is the transactional email provider, the error tracker or the log aggregator. Where we could not cover a vendor we kept patient data away from it and wrote down that decision, because "we do not send them anything" is only credible if someone recorded it.

The half nobody budgets for

When we mapped the finished build against the HIPAA Security Rule, the technical column came out complete and the administrative column had barely been started. That is roughly 60% of the Rule by specification count, and it is the half a customer's due-diligence questionnaire opens with. A risk analysis is required and is the most commonly cited deficiency in enforcement actions, so strong encryption without one is a weaker audit position than modest encryption with one.

We tell clients this at the start rather than at handover, because the technical safeguards are the part a development team can finish alone and the administrative ones are not. None of the technical work required leaving Laravel. Encryption, policy-based authorisation, signed URLs, scheduled jobs and event logging are framework features. The work was in the design decisions and in applying them consistently.

Read the full case study →
Case study

An AI interview pipeline that runs our own hiring

We built this on Laravel and use it ourselves. Every interview we run goes through it.

How it works

1
The interview happens on Zoom

The platform schedules it, invites the panel and syncs calendars through the Zoom API. When the call ends, a webhook fires.

2
The recording is collected

A queued job pulls the cloud recording and passes it on. Retries and backoff are handled by Horizon, so a Zoom hiccup costs nothing.

3
Transcription

The audio goes to AssemblyAI. Rather than blocking a worker for several minutes, the job finishes and a webhook resumes the chain when the transcript is ready.

4
Analysis

Prism sends the transcript to a Groq-hosted model with a structured output schema covering competency signals, communication quality and risk flags. It comes back as typed data, not prose we have to parse.

5
Scoring and review

Results are scored against configurable weights and shown in Filament, where a person reviews, overrides and decides. The AI drafts the assessment and a human owns it.

Job chains, not request cycles

Every step retries on its own. A provider outage pauses the pipeline instead of losing the interview.

Structured output, not prose

The model returns typed data against a schema, so results can be queried, compared and tested.

A person owns the decision

Filament makes review the default path. The system is fast because it drafts, not because it decides alone.

How we work

Built to hold up after we leave

Enterprise teams care less about how fast something ships than about what happens to it eighteen months later. So do we.

Tested, not just demoed

Feature and unit test coverage on the paths that matter, running in CI on every pull request.

Reviewed by people

Every change goes through peer review with static analysis and enforced formatting. Nothing goes straight to production.

Secure by default

Signed URLs, policy-based authorisation, encrypted secrets, dependency auditing and least-privilege credentials on every integration.

Kept up to date

We keep Laravel and PHP current as part of delivery, so you do not inherit a system three major versions behind and frozen.

Monitored from day one

Structured logging, queue monitoring, error tracking and performance metrics wired in before launch rather than after the first incident.

Documented handover

Architecture decisions, runbooks and onboarding docs written as we go, so your team can take over whenever you want to.

Engagement models

Four ways to start

Architecture review

1 to 2 weeks

We audit your existing Laravel system across architecture, performance, security, upgrade path and test coverage, then hand you a prioritised plan. Useful before a funding round, an acquisition or a rebuild decision.

You have a system and want an honest second opinion.

Discovery sprint

2 to 3 weeks

Requirements, domain modelling, technical architecture and a costed delivery plan with milestones. You leave with a specification you could hand to anyone, including someone other than us.

You know the problem but not yet the shape of the solution.

Full build

3 to 9 months

A dedicated squad with an engineering lead, developers and QA, delivering in two-week increments against an agreed roadmap, through to production and a documented handover.

You need a system built and shipped.

Embedded team

Ongoing

Senior Laravel engineers working inside your team, your process and your board. Scale up for a push and scale down after, with no recruitment cycle and no ramp-up tax.

You have the team and the process, just not enough capacity.

Where this fits best

Sectors where complex domain rules, regulatory pressure and high document volume make this kind of platform pay for itself quickly.

Healthcare

Sensitive data, clinical workflows, HIPAA obligations.

HIPAA-compliant multi-tenant platforms, referral routing between practices, clinical document handling, patient intake automation, consent and access auditing.

Financial services

Audit trails, document-heavy processes, strict access control.

Loan origination workflows, KYC document extraction, reconciliation automation, regulatory reporting.

Logistics and supply chain

High event volume, many integrations, real-time visibility.

Shipment tracking platforms, carrier integrations, exception detection, live operations dashboards.

Manufacturing

Shop-floor data, ERP integration, quality processes.

Production tracking, ERP integration layers, quality inspection workflows, maintenance scheduling.

SaaS and software vendors

Multi-tenancy, scale economics, fast feature delivery.

Multi-tenant architecture, usage-based billing, AI feature layers, white-label deployments.

Professional services

Knowledge work, billable time, document volume.

Matter and project management, contract analysis, time capture automation, client portals.

Questions we get from engineering leaders

Tell us about your system

Book a technical conversation with the engineers who would actually build it.

Get in Touch Get in Touch